Injustice League The Premier League table, corrected by the officials' own panel How it works

Matchweek 9

Season to date: every match kicked off before Fri 6 Nov 2026, 20:00 UTC.

The Injustice League

Pos Team For Agst W D L GF GA GD Pts
1 LiverpoolLiverpool 0 2 −1 0 +1 −1 +1 −2 −3
2 BrentfordBrentford 0 1 −1 +1 0 −1 0 −1 −2
2 Ipswich TownIpswich 0 1 −1 +1 0 −1 0 −1 −2
4 Manchester UnitedMan Utd 1 1 0 −1 +1 0 +1 −1 −1
5 Brighton and Hove AlbionBrighton 0 1 0 0 0 −1 0 −1 0
5 Tottenham HotspurSpurs 0 2 0 0 0 −1 0 −1 0
7 BournemouthBournemouth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Coventry CityCoventry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 EvertonEverton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 FulhamFulham 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Newcastle UnitedNewcastle 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 SunderlandSunderland 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 Aston VillaVilla 3 2 0 0 0 −1 −2 +1 0
13 ChelseaChelsea 2 1 0 0 0 0 −1 +1 0
13 Crystal PalacePalace 1 0 0 0 0 +1 0 +1 0
16 Nottingham ForestForest 1 1 0 +1 −1 +1 +1 0 +1
17 Hull CityHull 1 0 0 +1 −1 0 −1 +1 +1
17 Leeds UnitedLeeds 1 0 0 +1 −1 0 −1 +1 +1
19 ArsenalArsenal 1 3 +1 −1 0 −1 −1 0 +2
20 Manchester CityMan City 2 0 +1 −1 0 +1 −1 +2 +2

How much refereeing errors have cost or given each team, season to date. Each column is real minus corrected: Pts −3 means wrong calls have cost a team 3 points, and W +1 means one of its wins should not have been a win. For and Agst count the wrong calls that went each way. ▲ up / ▼ down after this matchweek's report.

The corrected table

Every correction applied

The Premier League table, season to date, with every reviewed correction applied.

Pos Team P W D L GF GA GD Pts
1 ArsenalArsenal 9 7 1 1 15 6 +9 22
2 Brighton and Hove AlbionBrighton 9 6 1 2 25 7 +18 19
3 Manchester CityMan City 9 6 1 2 19 11 +8 19
4 LiverpoolLiverpool 9 5 3 1 12 8 +4 18
5 BrentfordBrentford 9 4 4 1 17 9 +8 16
6 ChelseaChelsea 9 5 1 3 19 16 +3 16
7 EvertonEverton 9 3 4 2 9 9 0 13
8 Ipswich TownIpswich 9 4 1 4 15 18 −3 13
9 BournemouthBournemouth 9 3 3 3 14 13 +1 12
10 Tottenham HotspurSpurs 9 3 3 3 11 10 +1 12
11 Aston VillaVilla 9 3 3 3 11 15 −4 12
12 Newcastle UnitedNewcastle 9 3 2 4 12 15 −3 11
13 Hull CityHull 9 2 4 3 11 11 0 10
14 Leeds UnitedLeeds 9 2 4 3 9 9 0 10
15 FulhamFulham 9 2 3 4 9 11 −2 9
16 Coventry CityCoventry 9 3 0 6 9 16 −7 9
17 Manchester UnitedMan Utd 9 1 5 3 10 14 −4 8
18 Crystal PalacePalace 9 2 1 6 8 21 −13 7
19 Nottingham ForestForest 9 1 2 6 5 11 −6 5
20 SunderlandSunderland 9 1 2 6 7 17 −10 5

Matchweek 9's corrections

Chelsea 2–0 Manchester United score unchanged Matchweek 9

59:58: Second Caution Dismissal not given. Challenge by Martinez (MUN) on Fofana (CHE)

No change to the score. The error went against Chelsea.

The referee's decision to award a second caution for the reckless challenge by Martinez after the VAR review was also unanimously supported.

On-field decision
Incorrect (0:5)
VAR
N/A

Panel votes are shown as correct:incorrect. Source: KMI Panel decisions, Match Round 9 (PDF), Premier League article.

Hull City 2–2 Ipswich Town becomes 2–3 Matchweek 9

17:31: Penalty not awarded. Challenge by Mendy (HUL) on O'Shea (IPS)

Ipswich Town should have had a penalty. We count it as scored: +1 goal for Ipswich Town.

This was a split decision, 4:1, with the majority feeling that there was a clear sustained holding offence by Mendy and a penalty should have been awarded. One panellist considered that the actions of O'Shea and Florentino should have been taken into account, meaning no penalty.

On-field decision
Incorrect - foul by Mendy (1:4)
VAR
Incorrect - clear and obvious error (1:4)

Panel votes are shown as correct:incorrect. Source: KMI Panel decisions, Match Round 9 (PDF), Premier League article.

Liverpool 0–1 Arsenal becomes 1–1 Matchweek 9

19:57: Penalty not awarded. Challenge by Timber (ARS) on Isak (LIV)

Liverpool should have had a penalty. We count it as scored: +1 goal for Liverpool.

The panel felt that a penalty should have been awarded for a holding action by Timber on Isak, 4:1. One panellist considered the short-lived holding to lack clear impact on the ability of Isak to progress. The majority also felt that VAR should have intervened to recommend an on-field review, 3:2, on the basis that it was a clear and obvious error. Two panellists considered that the subjectivity in assessing impact meant this did not meet the high threshold for VAR intervention.

On-field decision
Incorrect - foul by Timber (1:4)
VAR
Incorrect - clear and obvious error (2:3)

Panel votes are shown as correct:incorrect. Source: KMI Panel decisions, Match Round 9 (PDF), Premier League article.